<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They call me the beeping bandit!  Because thats what I do&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 21:01:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 23:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I have it written down that I commented you on this blog, but it&#039;s not here, so I&#039;m going to try again! I agree with you when you say &quot;I found it interesting how after all of the information she ties in to this essay to define the sex/gender system, in the end she describes it as having “lost much of its traditional function.&quot; I too thought the same thing. I also agree with you that Rubin is, in a way, telling Marx off by saying “A woman is a woman.  She only becomes a domestic, a wife, a chattel, a playboy bunny, a prostitute, or a human dictaphone in certain relations.” I like that she is strong in her defense. As for Rubin&#039;s stance on &quot;women as gifts,&quot; I think you hit the nail on the head! I believe that you are correct when you say that women are&quot;objects for people to just take dibs on.&quot; I think that this is one of the main points of her piece. I think her main goal here was to point out the oppression of women and mostly to defend them. Great observations!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have it written down that I commented you on this blog, but it&#8217;s not here, so I&#8217;m going to try again! I agree with you when you say &#8220;I found it interesting how after all of the information she ties in to this essay to define the sex/gender system, in the end she describes it as having “lost much of its traditional function.&#8221; I too thought the same thing. I also agree with you that Rubin is, in a way, telling Marx off by saying “A woman is a woman.  She only becomes a domestic, a wife, a chattel, a playboy bunny, a prostitute, or a human dictaphone in certain relations.” I like that she is strong in her defense. As for Rubin&#8217;s stance on &#8220;women as gifts,&#8221; I think you hit the nail on the head! I believe that you are correct when you say that women are&#8221;objects for people to just take dibs on.&#8221; I think that this is one of the main points of her piece. I think her main goal here was to point out the oppression of women and mostly to defend them. Great observations!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .: Carnival 2 :.</title>
		<link>http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>.: Carnival 2 :.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] “Gender,” and the resulting relationships are a social product. (1668) Marina provides us with a very clear and concise definition of the sex gender system and the way in which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Gender,” and the resulting relationships are a social product. (1668) Marina provides us with a very clear and concise definition of the sex gender system and the way in which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carawhalen</title>
		<link>http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>carawhalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marina628.wordpress.com/2007/02/28/they-call-me-the-beeping-bandit-because-thats-what-i-do/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Your description of the main point of the essay regarding the definition of sex/gender system was clearly discussed. By using the text to back up your view it brought forth a sense of a great understanding of the material. However, I thought that the usage of the theorists weren&#039;t as affective as they could have been. I feel that Rubin should have reached out to use not only men, both for and against her argument, but also reach out to women. Granted there weren&#039;t any famous/known women theorists, I feel that it would have been in her favor to gain a credible source. Overall, I found Rubin to make good points, but leave a lot of room for debate...Your post helped to clear up some foggy points for me, Thanks!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your description of the main point of the essay regarding the definition of sex/gender system was clearly discussed. By using the text to back up your view it brought forth a sense of a great understanding of the material. However, I thought that the usage of the theorists weren&#8217;t as affective as they could have been. I feel that Rubin should have reached out to use not only men, both for and against her argument, but also reach out to women. Granted there weren&#8217;t any famous/known women theorists, I feel that it would have been in her favor to gain a credible source. Overall, I found Rubin to make good points, but leave a lot of room for debate&#8230;Your post helped to clear up some foggy points for me, Thanks!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
